On June 23, 2026, Ola Cell Technologies, the battery subsidiary of Ola Electric, India's largest two-wheeler EV maker, announced that its in-house-developed LFP (lithium iron phosphate) "46100" cylindrical cell had received certification from the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The company positions itself as "the first Indian company to achieve BIS compliance with a self-developed cell." This marks a step closer to mass-producing batteries entirely within India.
This news is not something Japanese makers who supply, or are aiming to supply, batteries, cathode and anode materials, separators, or EV parts to India can afford to ignore. India's battery supply chain currently relies on imports for almost its entire volume, mostly from China. Add to that the fact that "a local company has built its own cell in-house and even cleared standards certification," and the choice Japanese suppliers face, between the model of "selling finished cells into India" and the model of "working supply into local cell production as it gets under way," becomes that much more pressing. This article lays out the triggering news and then considers the concrete moves Japanese companies should make.
Sticking to the facts as announced: the certification was received for the LFP 46100 cell developed in-house by Ola Cell Technologies, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ola Electric. The specifications confirmable from reporting are an energy density of over 170 Wh/kg and a designed charge-discharge cycle life of up to 4,000 cycles. It is described as a general-purpose cell intended for both EVs and stationary energy storage (ESS).
The certification is a BIS certification based on IS 16046 (Part 2): 2018 / IEC 62133-2: 2017, and the cell is also said to comply with IS 16893 (Parts 2 and 3) and UN 38.3. On the production side, equipment installation at the 6 GWh gigafactory is said to be "nearly complete," with commercialization expected by the end of Q1 of FY27 (fiscal year 2026).
This 46100 cell is the company's second in-house cell, following the NMC (nickel manganese cobalt) "4680 Bharat Cell" it had already been working on. The design approach, rolling out both NMC and LFP on the shared "46 series" form-factor architecture and switching chemistry depending on the application, is evident here.
Ola Electric is an emerging maker that has come to hold a large share of India's electric two-wheeler market. What sets it apart from other vehicle makers is that it has placed in-house battery cell production at the core of its management strategy, not just scooter sales. It has pursued a strategy of running both vehicle batteries and energy storage through cell development, for example building its home energy storage system "Ola Shakti" around its own cells.
BIS certification is the framework of mandatory standards compliance required to distribute and sell products within India. For a product like a battery, where safety is at stake, whether or not it holds this certification is effectively a condition for market entry. Conversely, the fact that a local company has cleared this hurdle with its own cell shows that a system for running batteries within India without relying on imported cells is taking shape.
On the policy side, India launched a PLI (production-linked incentive) scheme for ACC (advanced chemistry cells) in 2021, setting a national goal of breaking away from import dependence. Progress, however, has been unimpressive. According to a tally by one energy-sector research firm, as of October 2025 operational cell manufacturing capacity stood at just 1.4 GWh against a 50 GWh target, an achievement rate of 2.8%, and all of that capacity is said to belong to Ola Electric. India's dependence on imported battery cells remains close to 100%, with China accounting for most of it. Some point out that delays in approving visas for Chinese engineers have also held back getting the equipment running.
Lining up only the figures that can be verified gives a picture of where things stand now.
What stands out is that Ola is the sole holder of operational output across the entire PLI scheme. The further the national target falls short, the more the presence of the first company to reach mass-production scale stands out by comparison.
Since the announcement, several views have circulated within India's manufacturing industry (summarized in substance, speakers anonymous).
First, there is the view that clearing standards compliance with an in-house-developed cell is a symbolic step forward. The sense is that Indian cell manufacturing has so far centered on assembly, with few examples of a company carrying everything from design through certification on its own.
Second, there are also cautious views. Getting certified and running stable mass production are different things, the argument goes, and it only matters once the company reaches the stage of being able to "make it cheaper than importing," factoring in yield, cost, and raw material procurement. This is a view grounded in the rule of thumb that even after equipment installation is finished, ramping up takes time.
Third, from the side that supplies materials and equipment, there is hope that as local cell production grows, so will the need to source cathode and anode materials, separators, and manufacturing equipment locally. The view is that as room for exporting finished cells shrinks, the business opportunity shifts upstream, to materials and equipment.
This is where it gets to the point. How should Japanese battery, materials, and EV parts makers read the fact that India's battery localization has taken a step forward? Let's lay it out in terms of both threats and opportunities.
On the threat side, the first thing to note is that the shelf life of the "export finished cells to India" scenario is coming into view. As companies like Ola emerge that handle design, mass production, and certification locally, imported cells are set to become more disadvantaged on price and policy alike. The PLI scheme is a mechanism designed to favor local production, and the more local production gets on track, the more the price and procurement advantage of imported finished cells erodes. Japanese makers whose main line is simply exporting finished cells may be forced to rethink their strategy over a five-year horizon.
On the other hand, many On the opportunity side, this is really where things converge. India's weak point lies not in cell assembly itself but in what comes before it: materials, equipment, and process technology. Cathode and anode materials, electrolyte, separators and other components, manufacturing equipment, and the know-how for quality control and safety evaluation are all areas that lack depth locally, as the roughly 100% import-dependence figure shows. The more Ola gets mass production up and running, and the more Indian companies follow, the more demand for upstream materials, equipment, and technical support will grow without question. Shifting the mindset from "selling cells to India" to "becoming the side that supports India's cell localization" is a realistic path to winning for Japanese players.
As a concrete first move, the place to start is identifying by name the operators that have made clear their intent to produce cells in India, and mapping out on a process flow which stage of the operation the company's own materials or equipment could feed into. Ola Cell Technologies is the leading candidate, but companies selected under the PLI scheme, and two- and three-wheeler EV makers exploring localization, are also targets. Rather than vaguely targeting "the Indian market," the starting point is working things out company by company, down to the level of "this component of ours, into this process at this cell plant." If delays in visas for Chinese engineers are a local weak point, offering a package that includes startup support and process guidance from the Japanese side is also worth considering as a point of differentiation.
This move is not confined to batteries alone. LFP cells have strengths in cost and cycle life, making them suited not only to EVs but to stationary energy storage (ESS) as well. The fact that Ola runs both vehicle batteries and home energy storage through the same cell also ties into the expansion of renewable energy in India. It amounts to a structure of meeting energy storage demand in regions with unstable power infrastructure using domestically made cells.
For Japanese makers, this opens up proposals for materials and equipment aimed not only at vehicle EVs but also at the stationary energy storage exit. The wider the range of applications, the broader the base of upstream materials demand becomes. For EV parts makers, there is also room to consider local entry in areas around the battery pack, such as BMS, thermal management, and housings, rather than the cell itself.
Here are the practical points worth keeping in mind when sharpening a strategy for India.
First, track the latest adoption and progress of BIS certification and the PLI scheme through primary sources. The scheme continues to fall short of its targets, and its requirements and scope could be revised. Second, take stock of which stage of India's cell production your own products (materials, equipment, technology) correspond to. Third, if you currently rely mainly on exporting finished products, start early on considering supply-format options (materials supply, joint venture, technology licensing) to prepare for a shift toward local production. In every case, the premise is to identify the counterpart company by name and narrow your own move down to one.
The fact that a subsidiary of Ola Electric became the first Indian company to obtain BIS certification for an LFP 46100 cell should be read not as an isolated piece of news but as a sign that India's battery supply chain is beginning to shift its center of gravity from "imports" to "local production." For Japanese battery, materials, and EV parts makers, the scenario of exporting finished cells is set to shrink, while the field of materials, equipment, and technical support that underpins localization will surely expand. The shift is from "selling cells to India" to "working into India's cell localization." Identifying targets company by company and narrowing your own move down to a single process is the starting point for an India strategy from here on.
RECENT
2026.09.24Bridgestone India’s 30th-anniversary film builds on the founder’s motto2026.09.24Flipkart’s move: putting the two meanings of "BBD" on Kolkata buses2026.09.24Veteran fertilizer maker KICL enters beverages with coconut water, starting in three South Indian states2026.09.24Pinit delivers saris in under 45 minutes, setting up a mirror and lighting at the customer’s home to choose fromCONTACT
Considering entering the Indian market?
Building on the developments on the ground covered in this article, we will suggest an approach that fits your products.
Book a free consultation →SOJAPAN
We support Japanese companies entering India, from market research through local partner development, test sales, and import.